S1 · Deep dive 02 · Citation-led evidence review

Why sunflower microgreens are more than a supporting ingredient.

Sunflower microgreens are included in Only Plants because they offer a broad young-plant nutritional matrix rather than one isolated “active ingredient.” Published studies have measured protein, fibre, vitamin C, minerals, chlorophylls, lutein, phenolic compounds and flavonoids in sunflower microgreens or their dried powder. Ghoora et al., 2020 Di Gioia et al., 2023 Mansouri et al., 2024

The precise composition depends on cultivar, cultivation conditions, developmental stage, processing and analytical method. The actual Only Plants powder must therefore be analysed before published values can be attributed to the product.

Food-composition evidence · not a clinical health claim
13supplied files audited
9eligible unique sunflower-microgreen sources
6primary experimental studies
0human trials or finished-product studies

Defined evidence set. Thirteen supplied files were audited. Nine unique sources were eligible for sunflower-microgreen evidence: six primary studies and three supporting reviews. One exact duplicate and three materially different or non-primary sources were kept visible in the audit but excluded from sunflower-microgreen claims. Last reviewed: 1 August 2026.

Why sunflower is in Only Plants

Broad young-plant nutrition in a whole-food format.

Sunflower microgreens have a clear and independent reason to be part of Only Plants.

A study of dried sunflower-microgreen powder reported 38.4% protein, 14.27% fat and 8.1% crude fibre. The powder was successfully incorporated into gluten-free cakes, demonstrating that sunflower microgreens can be dried, milled and used as a whole-food ingredient. Mansouri et al., 2024

Other studies measured vitamin C, calcium, potassium, zinc, copper, chlorophylls, lutein, phenolic compounds and flavonoids in fresh or processed sunflower microgreens. Ghoora et al., 2020 Di Gioia et al., 2023 Balik et al., 2025

In simple terms: sunflower was selected to bring broad young-plant nutrition into the formulation. It is not a carrier, filler or secondary version of radish.

The short answer

Three reasons sunflower microgreens are scientifically interesting.

Their value begins with nutritional diversity, practical whole-food use and the opportunity to define a consistent ingredient—not with a borrowed medical promise.

02 · A usable whole-food ingredient

Dried and milled—not selectively extracted.

One food-formulation study used dried sunflower-microgreen powder at different inclusion levels and documented nutritional, technological and sensory changes. Mansouri et al., 2024

03 · A material that can be improved

Production choices become scientific variables.

Light, cultivation, seed treatment and harvest timing can influence growth and composition. This creates an opportunity to define and standardise the ingredient. Gupta et al., 2024 Chew & Subramaniam, 2024

What sunflower microgreens naturally contain

Not one compound—a young-plant matrix.

Published values describe specific study materials and methods. They demonstrate nutritional potential, but they are not specifications for the Only Plants powder.

Protein and fibre

Dried whole-food material.

Cabinet-dried sunflower-microgreen powder contained 38.4% protein and 8.1% crude fibre in one study. Mansouri et al., 2024

Vitamin C

Measurable—and variable.

Ghoora and colleagues reported 94.0 mg per 100 g fresh weight; Balik and colleagues reported 67.55 mg under different conditions. Ghoora et al., 2020 Balik et al., 2025

Minerals

Context belongs to the number.

Calcium, potassium, zinc, copper and other minerals were measured, but amounts differed considerably between cultivation systems. Di Gioia et al., 2023 Balik et al., 2025

Pigments

Components of the young plant.

Sunflower microgreens contained chlorophylls and lutein in a ten-species comparison. Ghoora et al., 2020

Phenolics and flavonoids

Chemical activity is not a clinical outcome.

Multiple studies measured these compounds, and extracts showed activity in laboratory antioxidant assays. Those assays do not establish an antioxidant effect inside the human body. Ghoora et al., 2020 Balik et al., 2025 Chakraborty et al., 2025

Why the microgreen stage matters

A sunflower microgreen is not simply a smaller sunflower seed.

A sunflower microgreen is a young, actively developing plant. At this stage it has formed shoots and leaves and contains plant components associated with early growth and photosynthesis.

The studies did not all examine identical developmental material. Sunflower was harvested seven days after germination, ten days after sowing, after 14 days, or when the first true leaves appeared. Gupta et al., 2024 Di Gioia et al., 2023 Chakraborty et al., 2025 Ghoora et al., 2020

The correct question is not simply “Is this sunflower?” It is “Which sunflower, grown how, and harvested at which stage?”

The central scientific lesson

“Sunflower microgreens” is not one fixed composition.

Values from one published experiment cannot automatically be applied to another product. Cultivar, seed source, substrate, light, nutrients, harvest age, sample preparation and analytical method can influence the result. Chew & Subramaniam, 2024 Kainikkara et al., 2025

Two studies reported different vitamin C values: 94.0 and 67.55 mg per 100 g fresh weight. The plants were produced and analysed under different experimental conditions. Ghoora et al., 2020 Balik et al., 2025

Balik and colleagues reported 148.63 mg calcium and 273.47 mg potassium per 100 g fresh weight. Di Gioia and colleagues reported 41.76 mg calcium and 101.31 mg potassium in ‘Black oil’ sunflower grown in a different system. Balik et al., 2025 Di Gioia et al., 2023

Correct conclusion: neither published result is automatically the Only Plants result.

01Define the crop

Cultivar, seed lot, environment, substrate and harvest stage.

02Measure it fresh

Establish the starting composition of the edible material.

03Measure the powder

Determine what remains after drying and milling.

04Test the mixture

Characterise the actual formulation and its stability.

05Study digestion

Only then investigate what may become bioaccessible.

Light, harvest and processing

How sunflower is produced affects what sunflower becomes.

A sunflower-specific review found that light spectrum, light intensity, photoperiod, pretreatment and harvest timing can influence growth, yield and composition. It also identified gaps in direct sunflower-specific lighting research. Chew & Subramaniam, 2024

Processing introduces another layer. Mansouri and colleagues dried sunflower microgreens at 50 °C, milled them to 500 μm and used the resulting powder in food. A different drying method may produce a different final composition. Mansouri et al., 2024

For Only Plants, cultivation, harvest stage, drying, milling and storage are part of the scientific definition of the ingredient—not merely production details.

The six primary studies

What each experiment actually contributes.

Each card identifies the tested material, the observation and the boundary that prevents over-transfer to Only Plants.

Fresh microgreensComposition and antioxidant assays

Ghoora et al. (2020)

Studied: ten culinary microgreens grown in vermicompost-enriched soil and harvested when the first true leaves appeared.

Observed: sunflower contained measurable ascorbic acid, lutein, chlorophylls, phenolics and flavonoids. Laboratory extracts demonstrated activity in four cell-free antioxidant assays.

Boundary: extract-based laboratory antioxidant results do not demonstrate an antioxidant effect in people.

Read the paper · DOI 10.1016/j.jafr.2020.100046 ↗
Fresh microgreensComparative mineral study

Di Gioia et al. (2023)

Studied: seventeen species grown under the same controlled greenhouse conditions; ‘Black oil’ sunflower was harvested ten days after sowing.

Observed: sunflower had the highest shoot fresh weight and dry-matter concentration and the lowest nitrate concentration in the comparison. The authors classified it as a good source of zinc and copper.

Boundary: one cultivar and one cultivation system, using fresh tissue—not dried Only Plants powder.

Read the paper · DOI 10.3389/fpls.2023.1220691 ↗
Dried microgreen powderDirect food-format relevance

Mansouri et al. (2024)

Studied: sunflower microgreens dried at 50 °C, milled and used at 4%, 8% and 12% flour replacement in gluten-free cakes.

Observed: the powder contained 38.4% protein and 8.1% crude fibre. Its inclusion changed several nutritional, technological and sensory measures.

Boundary: a food-formulation experiment—not a capsule, digestion or clinical study.

Read the paper · DOI 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116049 ↗
Experimental seed treatmentVariability demonstration

Gupta et al. (2024)

Studied: sunflower seeds primed with different concentrations of ferric-oxide nanoparticles and grown for seven days.

Observed: the treatments altered biomass, photosynthetic measures, phenolic content, antioxidant-enzyme activity and several mineral concentrations.

Boundary: these were experimentally nano-primed plants and are not equivalent to conventionally cultivated sunflower microgreens.

Read the paper · DOI 10.17221/272/2024-PSE ↗
Fresh microgreensUseful—but numerically cautious

Balik et al. (2025)

Studied: six microgreen species grown in a peat-based medium and harvested after the first true leaves developed.

Observed: sunflower was analysed for vitamin C, minerals, sugars, organic acids, phenolics, flavonoids, nitrate and volatile compounds.

Boundary: some narrative statements conflict with the published tables. Numerical claims on this page use the table values and omit the disputed labels.

Read the paper · DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-85860-z ↗
Shade-dried microgreen extractCell-free laboratory assays

Chakraborty et al. (2025)

Studied: fourteen-day sunflower microgreens that were shade-dried and extracted with methanol.

Observed: the sunflower extract had the highest total flavonoid, phenolic and tannin measurements in a nine-species comparison and the lowest reported DPPH IC50.

Boundary: this was a concentrated methanolic extract tested in chemical and enzyme assays—not whole powder, digestion evidence or a human study.

Read the paper · DOI 10.56042/ijnpr.v16i4.18526 ↗

What the research collectively tells us

A coherent sunflower story—at the correct level of evidence.

The evidence supports sunflower as a measurable food material and dried powder ingredient. It does not establish a specific health effect in a person.

Food format

It can become a practical powder.

Sunflower microgreens can be dried, milled and incorporated into another food. Mansouri et al., 2024

Key uncertainty

The finished Only Plants product remains uncharacterised.

No eligible study analysed the specific cultivar, cultivation system, drying process, formulation, bottle stability, digestion or effects in people.

The literature supports sunflower as an ingredient worth selecting. Product-specific evidence must come from testing the actual product.

What this means for an Only Plants user

What you are choosing today.

Product-specific statements describe the Only Plants format; scientific statements remain linked to the literature that supports them.

01 · A whole young plant

Dried food material.

Only Plants uses dried and milled sunflower-microgreen material rather than a selectively concentrated sunflower extract.

03 · A convenient food format

Powder-processing precedent.

Research supports the feasibility of using sunflower microgreens as dried and milled food material. Mansouri et al., 2024

04 · An evidence boundary

No borrowed health promise.

Composition data, extract assays and cake results are not proof of what the Only Plants capsule does inside a person.

Sunflower microgreens are valuable because they bring broad young-plant nutrition into a convenient whole-food format—not because they have been clinically proven to prevent or treat disease.

Sunflower within the Only Plants formulation

Its own role—and a complementary one.

Within Only Plants, sunflower is not present simply to accompany radish. Sunflower contributes a broad young-plant nutritional matrix. Radish contributes specialised cruciferous phytochemistry, particularly its glucosinolate system. The two ingredients therefore have scientifically distinct and potentially complementary roles.

The published evidence supports the rationale for selecting each plant independently. However, no study has established that the combined radish–sunflower formulation produces an enhanced biological effect.

Evidence-informed nutritional complementarity—not proven biological synergy.

From published research to product knowledge

Four questions that genuinely matter next.

A later comparative experiment could investigate whether the combined formulation behaves differently from sunflower or radish alone.

01

Which sunflower are we using?

Document cultivar, seed lot, cultivation conditions, harvest age and included plant parts.

02

What is present in the actual powder?

Measure proximate composition, selected minerals and relevant phytochemical markers in defined production batches.

03

What survives until consumption?

Compare fresh material with the powder after drying, milling, blending and realistic bottle storage.

04

What can digestion access?

Use a standardised digestion model before discussing release, transformation, bioaccessibility or possible absorption.

Scientific and regulatory boundary

The eligible evidence establishes measurable composition in selected sunflower microgreens, laboratory chemical activity of selected extracts, effects of cultivation and treatment on plant material, and technological use of one dried powder in another food.

It does not establish clinical efficacy, bioavailability in people, prevention or treatment of disease, a health effect of the Only Plants finished formulation, or biological synergy between sunflower and radish.

Only Plants is food, not medicine. Any public nutrition or health wording requires separate assessment under the EU nutrition and health claims framework.

Evidence register

The nine eligible sources behind this page.

Six primary experiments support direct observations. Three reviews organise context without upgrading secondary claims into product evidence.

StudyEvidence roleWhat it supports hereSource
Ghoora et al. (2020)Primary; fresh comparative studyVitamin C, pigments, phenolics, flavonoids and antioxidant assaysDOI ↗
Di Gioia et al. (2023)Primary; fresh comparative studyDefined growth stage, yield, minerals and nitrateDOI ↗
Mansouri et al. (2024)Primary; dried-powder food studyPowder composition and food-formulation behaviourDOI ↗
Gupta et al. (2024)Primary; experimental nano-primingProduction intervention can alter physiology and compositionDOI ↗
Chew & Subramaniam (2024)Secondary sunflower-specific reviewLED, cultivation and harvest contextDOI ↗
Tallei et al. (2024)Secondary antioxidant reviewVariability and research-gap context onlyDOI ↗
Balik et al. (2025)Primary; fresh comparative studyVitamin C, phenolics, DPPH, minerals, nitrate and organic acidsDOI ↗
Kainikkara et al. (2025)Secondary comprehensive reviewDevelopment and processing context; evidence gapsDOI ↗
Chakraborty et al. (2025)Primary; dried methanolic extractPhenolics, flavonoids and cell-free DPPH assayDOI ↗

References used on this page

Every scientific claim returns to a DOI-linked source.

  1. Ghoora et al. (2020). Comparative study of nutritional composition and antioxidant activity of ten culinary microgreens. DOI 10.1016/j.jafr.2020.100046 ↗
  2. Di Gioia et al. (2023). Yield performance, mineral profile, and nitrate content in a selection of seventeen microgreen species. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1220691. DOI 10.3389/fpls.2023.1220691 ↗
  3. Mansouri et al. (2024). Sunflower microgreen powder as functional component to enhance the quality of gluten-free cakes. LWT, 198, 116049. DOI 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116049 ↗
  4. Gupta et al. (2024). Ferric oxide nano-priming enhances photosynthetic and physicochemical properties of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) microgreens. Plant, Soil and Environment, 70, 702–711. DOI 10.17221/272/2024-PSE ↗
  5. Chew & Subramaniam (2024). A review of the effects of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) on the growth of sunflower microgreens and their nutritional potential. Malaysian Applied Biology, 53(5), 1–13. DOI 10.55230/mabjournal.v53i5.3033 ↗
  6. Tallei et al. (2024). A comprehensive review on the antioxidant activities and health benefits of microgreens: current insights and future perspectives. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 59, 58–71. DOI 10.1111/ijfs.16805 ↗
  7. Balik et al. (2025). Nutritional quality profiles of six microgreens. Scientific Reports, 15, 6213. DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-85860-z ↗
  8. Kainikkara et al. (2025). Development strategies and processing effects on the nutritional and bioactive composition of microgreens: A comprehensive review. Applied Food Research, 5, 101280. DOI 10.1016/j.afres.2025.101280 ↗
  9. Chakraborty et al. (2025). Quantitative analysis of phytoconstituents and in-vitro biological activities of nine edible microgreens from West Bengal. Indian Journal of Natural Products and Resources, 16(4), 605–619. DOI 10.56042/ijnpr.v16i4.18526 ↗

Transparent exclusions. Polyiam and Thukhammee tested a sunflower-sprout protein isolate, not sunflower microgreens or whole powder. Chaisit et al. tested five-day sunflower sprouts extracted with 80% ethanol and administered to rats, not sunflower microgreens or the Only Plants formulation. Verma and Singh is a general microgreens e-magazine article without a DOI or original experimental evidence. The second Balik PDF is byte-identical to the first and is counted only once. Where Balik et al. contains a conflict between prose and published tables, this page follows the table values and omits disputed narrative labels.