S1 · Deep dive 02 · Citation-led evidence review
Why sunflower microgreens are more than a supporting ingredient.
Sunflower microgreens are included in Only Plants because they offer a
broad young-plant nutritional matrix rather than one isolated “active
ingredient.” Published studies have measured protein, fibre, vitamin C,
minerals, chlorophylls, lutein, phenolic compounds and flavonoids in
sunflower microgreens or their dried powder.
Ghoora et al., 2020
Di Gioia et al., 2023
Mansouri et al., 2024
The precise composition depends on cultivar, cultivation conditions,
developmental stage, processing and analytical method. The actual Only
Plants powder must therefore be analysed before published values can be
attributed to the product.
Food-composition evidence · not a clinical health claim
13supplied files audited
9eligible unique sunflower-microgreen sources
6primary experimental studies
0human trials or finished-product studies
Defined evidence set. Thirteen supplied files were audited.
Nine unique sources were eligible for sunflower-microgreen evidence: six
primary studies and three supporting reviews. One exact duplicate and three
materially different or non-primary sources were kept visible in the audit
but excluded from sunflower-microgreen claims. Last reviewed: 1 August 2026.
Why sunflower is in Only Plants
Broad young-plant nutrition in a whole-food format.
Sunflower microgreens have a clear and independent reason to be part of
Only Plants.
A study of dried sunflower-microgreen powder reported 38.4% protein,
14.27% fat and 8.1% crude fibre. The powder was successfully incorporated
into gluten-free cakes, demonstrating that sunflower microgreens can be
dried, milled and used as a whole-food ingredient.
Mansouri et al., 2024
Other studies measured vitamin C, calcium, potassium, zinc, copper,
chlorophylls, lutein, phenolic compounds and flavonoids in fresh or
processed sunflower microgreens.
Ghoora et al., 2020
Di Gioia et al., 2023
Balik et al., 2025
In simple terms: sunflower was selected to bring broad
young-plant nutrition into the formulation. It is not a carrier, filler
or secondary version of radish.
The short answer
Three reasons sunflower microgreens are scientifically interesting.
Their value begins with nutritional diversity, practical whole-food use
and the opportunity to define a consistent ingredient—not with a borrowed
medical promise.
01 · A broad nutritional matrix
More than one attractive molecule.
Sunflower microgreens contain multiple categories of naturally
occurring plant material, including protein, minerals, pigments,
vitamin C and phenolic compounds.
Ghoora et al., 2020
Di Gioia et al., 2023
Mansouri et al., 2024
02 · A usable whole-food ingredient
Dried and milled—not selectively extracted.
One food-formulation study used dried sunflower-microgreen powder at
different inclusion levels and documented nutritional, technological
and sensory changes.
Mansouri et al., 2024
03 · A material that can be improved
Production choices become scientific variables.
Light, cultivation, seed treatment and harvest timing can influence
growth and composition. This creates an opportunity to define and
standardise the ingredient.
Gupta et al., 2024
Chew & Subramaniam, 2024
What sunflower microgreens naturally contain
Not one compound—a young-plant matrix.
Published values describe specific study materials and methods. They
demonstrate nutritional potential, but they are not specifications for
the Only Plants powder.
Protein and fibre
Dried whole-food material.
Cabinet-dried sunflower-microgreen powder contained 38.4% protein and
8.1% crude fibre in one study.
Mansouri et al., 2024
Vitamin C
Measurable—and variable.
Ghoora and colleagues reported 94.0 mg per 100 g fresh weight; Balik
and colleagues reported 67.55 mg under different conditions.
Ghoora et al., 2020
Balik et al., 2025
Minerals
Context belongs to the number.
Calcium, potassium, zinc, copper and other minerals were measured, but
amounts differed considerably between cultivation systems.
Di Gioia et al., 2023
Balik et al., 2025
Pigments
Components of the young plant.
Sunflower microgreens contained chlorophylls and lutein in a
ten-species comparison.
Ghoora et al., 2020
Phenolics and flavonoids
Chemical activity is not a clinical outcome.
Multiple studies measured these compounds, and extracts showed activity
in laboratory antioxidant assays. Those assays do not establish an
antioxidant effect inside the human body.
Ghoora et al., 2020
Balik et al., 2025
Chakraborty et al., 2025
Why the microgreen stage matters
A sunflower microgreen is not simply a smaller sunflower seed.
A sunflower microgreen is a young, actively developing plant. At this
stage it has formed shoots and leaves and contains plant components
associated with early growth and photosynthesis.
The studies did not all examine identical developmental material.
Sunflower was harvested seven days after germination, ten days after
sowing, after 14 days, or when the first true leaves appeared.
Gupta et al., 2024
Di Gioia et al., 2023
Chakraborty et al., 2025
Ghoora et al., 2020
The correct question is not simply “Is this sunflower?”
It is “Which sunflower, grown how, and harvested at which stage?”
The central scientific lesson
“Sunflower microgreens” is not one fixed composition.
Values from one published experiment cannot automatically be applied to
another product. Cultivar, seed source, substrate, light, nutrients,
harvest age, sample preparation and analytical method can influence the
result.
Chew & Subramaniam, 2024
Kainikkara et al., 2025
Two studies reported different vitamin C values: 94.0 and 67.55 mg per
100 g fresh weight. The plants were produced and analysed under different
experimental conditions.
Ghoora et al., 2020
Balik et al., 2025
Balik and colleagues reported 148.63 mg calcium and 273.47 mg potassium
per 100 g fresh weight. Di Gioia and colleagues reported 41.76 mg calcium
and 101.31 mg potassium in ‘Black oil’ sunflower grown in a different
system.
Balik et al., 2025
Di Gioia et al., 2023
Correct conclusion: neither published result is
automatically the Only Plants result.
01Define the cropCultivar, seed lot, environment, substrate and harvest stage.
02Measure it freshEstablish the starting composition of the edible material.
03Measure the powderDetermine what remains after drying and milling.
04Test the mixtureCharacterise the actual formulation and its stability.
05Study digestionOnly then investigate what may become bioaccessible.
Light, harvest and processing
How sunflower is produced affects what sunflower becomes.
A sunflower-specific review found that light spectrum, light intensity,
photoperiod, pretreatment and harvest timing can influence growth, yield
and composition. It also identified gaps in direct sunflower-specific
lighting research.
Chew & Subramaniam, 2024
Processing introduces another layer. Mansouri and colleagues dried
sunflower microgreens at 50 °C, milled them to 500 μm and used the
resulting powder in food. A different drying method may produce a
different final composition.
Mansouri et al., 2024
For Only Plants, cultivation, harvest stage, drying, milling and storage
are part of the scientific definition of the ingredient—not merely
production details.
The six primary studies
What each experiment actually contributes.
Each card identifies the tested material, the observation and the
boundary that prevents over-transfer to Only Plants.
Fresh microgreensComposition and antioxidant assays
Ghoora et al. (2020)
Studied: ten culinary microgreens grown in vermicompost-enriched soil and harvested when the first true leaves appeared.
Observed: sunflower contained measurable ascorbic acid, lutein, chlorophylls, phenolics and flavonoids. Laboratory extracts demonstrated activity in four cell-free antioxidant assays.
Boundary: extract-based laboratory antioxidant results do not demonstrate an antioxidant effect in people.
Read the paper · DOI 10.1016/j.jafr.2020.100046 ↗
Fresh microgreensComparative mineral study
Di Gioia et al. (2023)
Studied: seventeen species grown under the same controlled greenhouse conditions; ‘Black oil’ sunflower was harvested ten days after sowing.
Observed: sunflower had the highest shoot fresh weight and dry-matter concentration and the lowest nitrate concentration in the comparison. The authors classified it as a good source of zinc and copper.
Boundary: one cultivar and one cultivation system, using fresh tissue—not dried Only Plants powder.
Read the paper · DOI 10.3389/fpls.2023.1220691 ↗
Dried microgreen powderDirect food-format relevance
Mansouri et al. (2024)
Studied: sunflower microgreens dried at 50 °C, milled and used at 4%, 8% and 12% flour replacement in gluten-free cakes.
Observed: the powder contained 38.4% protein and 8.1% crude fibre. Its inclusion changed several nutritional, technological and sensory measures.
Boundary: a food-formulation experiment—not a capsule, digestion or clinical study.
Read the paper · DOI 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116049 ↗
Experimental seed treatmentVariability demonstration
Gupta et al. (2024)
Studied: sunflower seeds primed with different concentrations of ferric-oxide nanoparticles and grown for seven days.
Observed: the treatments altered biomass, photosynthetic measures, phenolic content, antioxidant-enzyme activity and several mineral concentrations.
Boundary: these were experimentally nano-primed plants and are not equivalent to conventionally cultivated sunflower microgreens.
Read the paper · DOI 10.17221/272/2024-PSE ↗
Fresh microgreensUseful—but numerically cautious
Balik et al. (2025)
Studied: six microgreen species grown in a peat-based medium and harvested after the first true leaves developed.
Observed: sunflower was analysed for vitamin C, minerals, sugars, organic acids, phenolics, flavonoids, nitrate and volatile compounds.
Boundary: some narrative statements conflict with the published tables. Numerical claims on this page use the table values and omit the disputed labels.
Read the paper · DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-85860-z ↗
Shade-dried microgreen extractCell-free laboratory assays
Chakraborty et al. (2025)
Studied: fourteen-day sunflower microgreens that were shade-dried and extracted with methanol.
Observed: the sunflower extract had the highest total flavonoid, phenolic and tannin measurements in a nine-species comparison and the lowest reported DPPH IC50.
Boundary: this was a concentrated methanolic extract tested in chemical and enzyme assays—not whole powder, digestion evidence or a human study.
Read the paper · DOI 10.56042/ijnpr.v16i4.18526 ↗
What the research collectively tells us
A coherent sunflower story—at the correct level of evidence.
The evidence supports sunflower as a measurable food material and dried
powder ingredient. It does not establish a specific health effect in a
person.
Composition
Nutritional material is measurable.
Protein, fibre, vitamin C, minerals, pigments and phenolic compounds
have been measured in defined sunflower samples.
Ghoora et al., 2020
Di Gioia et al., 2023
Mansouri et al., 2024
Variability
The composition is not universal.
Cultivation, treatment, harvest, fresh-versus-dry basis, extraction
and analytical methods affect what is measured.
Gupta et al., 2024
Chew & Subramaniam, 2024
Kainikkara et al., 2025
Food format
It can become a practical powder.
Sunflower microgreens can be dried, milled and incorporated into
another food.
Mansouri et al., 2024
Key uncertainty
The finished Only Plants product remains uncharacterised.
No eligible study analysed the specific cultivar, cultivation system,
drying process, formulation, bottle stability, digestion or effects in people.
The literature supports sunflower as an ingredient worth selecting.
Product-specific evidence must come from testing the actual product.
What this means for an Only Plants user
What you are choosing today.
Product-specific statements describe the Only Plants format; scientific
statements remain linked to the literature that supports them.
01 · A whole young plantDried food material.
Only Plants uses dried and milled sunflower-microgreen material rather than a selectively concentrated sunflower extract.
02 · A deliberate ingredientA broad nutritional profile.
Sunflower contributes a combination of protein, minerals, pigments and phytochemical material. Ghoora et al., 2020 Di Gioia et al., 2023 Mansouri et al., 2024
03 · A convenient food formatPowder-processing precedent.
Research supports the feasibility of using sunflower microgreens as dried and milled food material. Mansouri et al., 2024
04 · An evidence boundaryNo borrowed health promise.
Composition data, extract assays and cake results are not proof of what the Only Plants capsule does inside a person.
Sunflower microgreens are valuable because they bring broad
young-plant nutrition into a convenient whole-food format—not because they
have been clinically proven to prevent or treat disease.
Sunflower within the Only Plants formulation
Its own role—and a complementary one.
Within Only Plants, sunflower is not present simply to accompany radish.
Sunflower contributes a broad young-plant nutritional matrix. Radish
contributes specialised cruciferous phytochemistry, particularly its
glucosinolate system. The two ingredients therefore have scientifically
distinct and potentially complementary roles.
The published evidence supports the rationale for selecting each plant
independently. However, no study has established that the combined
radish–sunflower formulation produces an enhanced biological effect.
Evidence-informed nutritional complementarity—not proven
biological synergy.
From published research to product knowledge
Four questions that genuinely matter next.
A later comparative experiment could investigate whether the combined
formulation behaves differently from sunflower or radish alone.
01Which sunflower are we using?
Document cultivar, seed lot, cultivation conditions, harvest age and included plant parts.
02What is present in the actual powder?
Measure proximate composition, selected minerals and relevant phytochemical markers in defined production batches.
03What survives until consumption?
Compare fresh material with the powder after drying, milling, blending and realistic bottle storage.
04What can digestion access?
Use a standardised digestion model before discussing release, transformation, bioaccessibility or possible absorption.
Scientific and regulatory boundary
The eligible evidence establishes measurable composition in selected
sunflower microgreens, laboratory chemical activity of selected extracts,
effects of cultivation and treatment on plant material, and technological
use of one dried powder in another food.
It does not establish clinical efficacy, bioavailability in
people, prevention or treatment of disease, a health effect of the Only
Plants finished formulation, or biological synergy between sunflower and
radish.
Only Plants is food, not medicine. Any public nutrition or health wording
requires separate assessment under the
EU nutrition and health claims framework.
Evidence register
The nine eligible sources behind this page.
Six primary experiments support direct observations. Three reviews
organise context without upgrading secondary claims into product evidence.
| Study | Evidence role | What it supports here | Source |
| Ghoora et al. (2020) | Primary; fresh comparative study | Vitamin C, pigments, phenolics, flavonoids and antioxidant assays | DOI ↗ |
| Di Gioia et al. (2023) | Primary; fresh comparative study | Defined growth stage, yield, minerals and nitrate | DOI ↗ |
| Mansouri et al. (2024) | Primary; dried-powder food study | Powder composition and food-formulation behaviour | DOI ↗ |
| Gupta et al. (2024) | Primary; experimental nano-priming | Production intervention can alter physiology and composition | DOI ↗ |
| Chew & Subramaniam (2024) | Secondary sunflower-specific review | LED, cultivation and harvest context | DOI ↗ |
| Tallei et al. (2024) | Secondary antioxidant review | Variability and research-gap context only | DOI ↗ |
| Balik et al. (2025) | Primary; fresh comparative study | Vitamin C, phenolics, DPPH, minerals, nitrate and organic acids | DOI ↗ |
| Kainikkara et al. (2025) | Secondary comprehensive review | Development and processing context; evidence gaps | DOI ↗ |
| Chakraborty et al. (2025) | Primary; dried methanolic extract | Phenolics, flavonoids and cell-free DPPH assay | DOI ↗ |
References used on this page
Every scientific claim returns to a DOI-linked source.
- Ghoora et al. (2020). Comparative study of nutritional composition and antioxidant activity of ten culinary microgreens. DOI 10.1016/j.jafr.2020.100046 ↗
- Di Gioia et al. (2023). Yield performance, mineral profile, and nitrate content in a selection of seventeen microgreen species. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1220691. DOI 10.3389/fpls.2023.1220691 ↗
- Mansouri et al. (2024). Sunflower microgreen powder as functional component to enhance the quality of gluten-free cakes. LWT, 198, 116049. DOI 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116049 ↗
- Gupta et al. (2024). Ferric oxide nano-priming enhances photosynthetic and physicochemical properties of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) microgreens. Plant, Soil and Environment, 70, 702–711. DOI 10.17221/272/2024-PSE ↗
- Chew & Subramaniam (2024). A review of the effects of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) on the growth of sunflower microgreens and their nutritional potential. Malaysian Applied Biology, 53(5), 1–13. DOI 10.55230/mabjournal.v53i5.3033 ↗
- Tallei et al. (2024). A comprehensive review on the antioxidant activities and health benefits of microgreens: current insights and future perspectives. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 59, 58–71. DOI 10.1111/ijfs.16805 ↗
- Balik et al. (2025). Nutritional quality profiles of six microgreens. Scientific Reports, 15, 6213. DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-85860-z ↗
- Kainikkara et al. (2025). Development strategies and processing effects on the nutritional and bioactive composition of microgreens: A comprehensive review. Applied Food Research, 5, 101280. DOI 10.1016/j.afres.2025.101280 ↗
- Chakraborty et al. (2025). Quantitative analysis of phytoconstituents and in-vitro biological activities of nine edible microgreens from West Bengal. Indian Journal of Natural Products and Resources, 16(4), 605–619. DOI 10.56042/ijnpr.v16i4.18526 ↗
Transparent exclusions. Polyiam and Thukhammee tested a
sunflower-sprout protein isolate, not sunflower microgreens or whole powder.
Chaisit et al. tested five-day sunflower sprouts extracted with 80% ethanol
and administered to rats, not sunflower microgreens or the Only Plants
formulation. Verma and Singh is a general microgreens e-magazine article
without a DOI or original experimental evidence. The second Balik PDF is
byte-identical to the first and is counted only once. Where Balik et al.
contains a conflict between prose and published tables, this page follows
the table values and omits disputed narrative labels.